Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
February 10, 2012, 03:12:PM
39348
Posts in
3301
Topics by
54
Members
Latest Member:
Cinema1964
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
WearetheMovies Forum :: Dubai's Finest Film Discussion Community
|
Movies
|
Sunset Boulevard
|
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
7
8
Print
Author
Topic: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009) (Read 5866 times)
ozzylogic
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3160
Coppertop
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #45 on:
June 21, 2009, 09:41:PM »
According to the review, the whole movie has so many 'bots you either lose count or interest, or both. Dunno what the fuck is wrong with Michael Bay. And then there's the camera on that skanky co-star Megan Fox.
Logged
Dracula: Blade, ready to die?
Blade: I was born ready motherf****r!
Dracula: Motherf****r... I like that.
ozzylogic
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3160
Coppertop
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #46 on:
June 24, 2009, 01:50:AM »
Get's a 3/5. Only because the food they served before the movie was decent. And the fact that I got free popcorn and Pepsi. Terrible movie.
I didn't expect a story, but didn't expect a mishmash of characters and personalities and cheap, lame jokes. I was expecting so much from it, been waiting for this movie since the end credits of the first part.
I want to hit Michael Bay really fucking hard with a camera but I'll leave the elaboration to Fizz's upcoming review. Watch this space.
Good news...I got a Decepticon and Autobot mask.
And they had a sweet Camaro on display!
«
Last Edit: June 24, 2009, 09:35:AM by ozzylogic
»
Logged
Dracula: Blade, ready to die?
Blade: I was born ready motherf****r!
Dracula: Motherf****r... I like that.
ozzylogic
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3160
Coppertop
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #47 on:
June 24, 2009, 06:27:PM »
A friend called, and he's like this hardcore Transformers fan, who's into collecting limited edition Transformers, etc...and the first thing he asked was "What the fuck did they do, how did they fuck it up?!"
In the end he said the only thing that could save the movie was the release of GIJoe, because it looks considerably worse!
Logged
Dracula: Blade, ready to die?
Blade: I was born ready motherf****r!
Dracula: Motherf****r... I like that.
fizz
Administrator
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4071
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #48 on:
June 24, 2009, 09:48:PM »
Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen
is an insufferable attempt at exercising all manner of excess. Most of what made the original film work exists here as well – including what can only be described as a gratuitous, semi-pornographic, cataract inducing usage of fiery explosions and chaotic robot crashes that lovingly explode on the screen. The film doesn’t lack anything except the good sense to realize when it’s gone overboard. This is not only an observation of the script (which meanders with semi-cooked ideas it can’t explain – like robots taking on human form), but also of performances, such as Shia LaBeouf’s Sam who hams his role and overacts his part as a savior of humanity and Earth.
This should come as no surprise. Director Michael Bay made
Bad Boys
watchable and its sequel torturous. Bay is the one-man powerhouse who defines what big summer blockbusters mean today – but also seems to incorporate in his sequels all the failing and trappings of where and how sequels go wrong if they indulge too much, encapsulating the law of diminishing returns.
Transformers 2
is an over-indulgent film made by an over-eager director. The film attempts at being funny with its juvenile humour, but many of the jokes, which mostly involve sexual innuendo not just between humans, but dogs and also robots, are embarrassing. Similarly, the decision to focus more on humans this time doesn’t pay off. Sam’s parents are probably the most nauseating onscreen pair this year and the film substitutes character development with robot variety (comic relief is provided by twin cars and other freak gadgets). Would you believe the most well developed and engaging person is a decades old Blackbird plane?
Though not an admirer of it, I was briskly entertained by the first film – which took its time with characters that did not grate and made a comparatively more restrained point about the masculine fascination and dependency on machines. This return offering is a misunderstood misfire. Take Megan Fox’s Mikaela for example. Bay understands her appeal for drooling internet fan boys, so he gives us numerous gyrating shots of her, on a bike, running, sweating; projecting all the grace of an air head Playboy bunny. Then there is all the globe-trotting, from the US to China and then Egypt, none of it sufficient in capturing the originals sense of scope. The Michael Bay who made that film was possibly humbled by the string of failures he had been struck with, but success now seems to have brought out his inner wild child.
The setups here are actually a lot like those in
Lord of the Rings
without the requisite vision or viewing satisfaction. Optimus Prime is essentially Gandalf, Megatron is Saruman, The Fallen is Sauron, the All Spark fragment is the One Ring, Sam is an Aragorn/Frodo hybrid, Mikaela is either Galadriel or Arwen, depending on your point of view, and so on. Despite this, Revenge of the Fallen has a lot more in common (tonally and in terms of execution) to
Howard the Duck
. The entire film is also, rather unapologetically, possibly the biggest product placement/movie tie-in that troubled car maker GM could ever receive or hope for, with their signature Chevrolet brand being both prominent and integral to the films plot. There is little irony then in my noting that
Transformers 2
, devoid of any entertainment value or pleasure, feels quite bankrupt.
Rating: 2/5
Logged
Narrative is the poison of cinema...There’s nothing more beautiful than elusiveness in cinema.
animatedude
wm seeder
orson welles
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2831
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #49 on:
June 25, 2009, 01:15:AM »
tsk...bad reviews everywhere,is it really that bad? didn't Spielberg say it's Micheal Bay's best?
Logged
"There's this whole school of thought that movies are always so great when you're 10 or 12 years old, and the reality of it is, when you're 10 or 12 years old, you've only seen 100 stories. By the time you get to be 25, you've seen 3,000. You've seen every permutation of every dramatic arc. And when somebody takes that and stands it on its head, that can be exciting."
David Fincher
ayaa1977
wm citizen
andrei tarkovsky
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2337
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #50 on:
June 25, 2009, 12:19:PM »
That was a great review Fizz. You managed to reflect on the career of Michael Bay and in the same time provide us with an excellent assessment of the film. Well done
Michael Bay, the king of larger-than-life everything. The more and bigger, the better.
Transformers
had a great deal of charm, but from what I'm hearing now from you and the other reviews, this one is sporadic and more interested in dazzling you with much robots and explosion than to tell a good story. That is a shame. In
Bad Boys II
he did the same, to the demise of that film. That essentially Achilles' heel for Mr. Bay; he doesn't know where to stop.
The Island
a few years ago started very well and surprisingly for Bay he was restrained in the first half of the film. He gave us an interesting story, then in the last half his true identity appeared and ruined the film big time.
Anyway, It is a train wreck that I have to see myself, hopefully next week when I go to Bahrain. Insha Allah.
Logged
shariqq
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6409
You never know...
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #51 on:
June 25, 2009, 02:21:PM »
Quote from: animatedude on June 25, 2009, 01:15:AM
tsk...bad reviews everywhere,is it really that bad? didn't Spielberg say it's Micheal Bay's best?
Ain't no matter what he say. Only matter what he do.
Logged
If you can't
convince
them,
confuse
them.
ayaa1977
wm citizen
andrei tarkovsky
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2337
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #52 on:
June 25, 2009, 02:33:PM »
Of course Spielberg would say that. It is a Dreamworks film. He would have nominated it for Best Picture Award if that would helps make him some extra cash.
«
Last Edit: June 25, 2009, 02:46:PM by ayaa1977
»
Logged
fizz
Administrator
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4071
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #53 on:
June 25, 2009, 03:40:PM »
Spielberg is executive producer...I would say that too even if my film was
Glitter
.
Logged
Narrative is the poison of cinema...There’s nothing more beautiful than elusiveness in cinema.
shariqq
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6409
You never know...
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #54 on:
June 25, 2009, 04:39:PM »
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
is not really a movie. It's daylight robbery. With the first movie being so loved all around and having earned enough money to run a country, all
Micheal Bay
had to do was push some wham-bam metal junkyard on screen and watch the money roll in. He seems to have succeeded spectacularly. To say that
Transformers 2
is a bad movie is simplifying it.
Sam Witwicky (
Shia LaBeouf
) is now in college and looking forward to a normal life, while the Autobots and the US Army fight Decepticons around the world. When shards of the original Cube are located by the Decepticons, so starts a cross-continental battle of destruction between the good and the bad that pulls in the familiar heroes and villains that include the ressuructed and the Fallen.
Micheal Bay
is a director with a limited range. Within that limitation he tends to excel, having made some of the best "explosion" summer-popcorn movies. But after all the money the first
Transformers
pulled in, he has been let run free. And what does he do with a $200M budget and no quality control by the studios? We get farting robots, humping dogs and even a mini-bot that humps the heroine's leg! There is not a scene in the movie that will make you think it was not written by a 14-year old.
I wrote the above two hours ago, and got so bored that I stopped.
My rating --> 1.5 of 5
Logged
If you can't
convince
them,
confuse
them.
ayaa1977
wm citizen
andrei tarkovsky
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 2337
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #55 on:
June 25, 2009, 04:56:PM »
My God Shariqq, I haven't read a post this angry from you in a long time. so much for a night of hanging out at the movies with your friends, ha? Now I am definitely gonna watch it, if only to share your pain, lol.
Logged
shariqq
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6409
You never know...
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #56 on:
June 25, 2009, 05:01:PM »
Random thoughts:
- I saw the movie on IMAX. Didn't make anything clearer. Just made too much TOO MUCH.
-
Tuturo
is grossly mismanaged. Want to know how bad the movie is? He wears an "S7" vest in the first movie, here he wears an "S7" thong.
- A robot that looks like a college girl? What?! I thought these were Transformers, not X-Men.
- Sam & Mikaela run from Petra (Jordan) to Giza (Egypt).
-
Jon Voight
and his South African analyst advisor are missing. Oh yes, governance changed from Bush to Obama.
- Yes, we do see the Devastator's "scrotum", as
Turturo
's character eloquently puts it.
I can't seem to get the bad taste of this movie out of my head. Will watch
LOTR:FOTR
over the weekend to cleanse myself.
Logged
If you can't
convince
them,
confuse
them.
shariqq
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6409
You never know...
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #57 on:
June 25, 2009, 05:19:PM »
Quote from: ayaa1977 on June 25, 2009, 04:56:PM
My God Shariqq, I haven't read a post this angry from you in a long time.
Oh no, I did not intend to come across as angry. It's just experssing how bad the movie is. I guess if I had completed the reivew, I would have polished the tone too.
Logged
If you can't
convince
them,
confuse
them.
fizz
Administrator
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 4071
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #58 on:
June 25, 2009, 08:58:PM »
That Egypt/Jordan crossing in seconds was priceless, its like they were twin cities. And robot shape shifters.
But that thong scene...oh God, I had nightmares. What a terrible miscalculation this film is.
Logged
Narrative is the poison of cinema...There’s nothing more beautiful than elusiveness in cinema.
ozzylogic
wm citizen
alfred hitchcock
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3160
Coppertop
Re: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
«
Reply #59 on:
June 25, 2009, 09:04:PM »
Loved your review Shreq, it's hilarious!
Logged
Dracula: Blade, ready to die?
Blade: I was born ready motherf****r!
Dracula: Motherf****r... I like that.
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
7
8
Print
WearetheMovies Forum :: Dubai's Finest Film Discussion Community
|
Movies
|
Sunset Boulevard
|
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Bay, 2009)
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
First Base
-----------------------------
=> The Speakerphone
-----------------------------
Movies
-----------------------------
=> Red Room
=> Sunset Boulevard
=> Floating Weeds
=> River Nile
=> Indus Valley
-----------------------------
Noble Distractions
-----------------------------
=> Paper Mill
=> Tube Talk
=> Musika
=> DVDs
-----------------------------
Other Stuff
-----------------------------
=> Random House
=> Live Wired
Powered by SMF 1.1.11
|
SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Loading...